Clinton's Donations by the Saudis (by Newsmax.com)
Mood:  cheeky
For the story behind the story... Thursday, Jan. 23, 2003 10:24 a.m. EST Hillary Tainted by Bin Laden Cash? New York Sen. Hillary Clinton's household income for 2002 included $750,000 in payments from three Arab nations with ties to the 9/11 hijackers, including a $267,000 speaking fee from a group funded by the family of Osama bin Laden, NewsMax.com has learned. In late January 2002, ex-president Bill Clinton traveled to bin Laden's hometown of Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, to address a group of Saudi businessmen. He was paid $267,000 for a 40-minute speech, according to a Jan. 25, 2002, report in The Middle East Newsfile, a British-based news service specializing in coverage of the region's business developments. Contemporaneous reports in London's Financial Times revealed that the audience included representatives of the BinLadin Group, which helped fund the Jeddah forum. The BinLadin Group is a leading Saudi construction company run by relatives of the 9/11 terrorist mastermind. Osama bin Laden grew up in the Red Sea port city of Jeddah. "The conference was dominated by the Saudis' desire to overcome the pressures of September 11 and strengthen U.S.-Saudi ties," the Times said. "The BinLadin Group, one of the forum's backers, has been battered by its association with Osama." The Times also noted that the forum's "pro-western businessmen are also some of the kingdom's biggest donors and they give generously to Muslim charities out of religious duty. The U.S. believes some of the contributions were siphoned off by some charities to finance terrorism and it wants better control over donations." During his January 2002 visit to the region, Clinton also collected nearly a half-million dollars for speeches in Egypt and the United Arab Emirates, the Middle East Newsfile said. Investigators probing the backgrounds of several of the 9/11 plotters have uncovered links to both countries. Some members of the Jeddah forum were mystified over the payments to Mr. Clinton. "How could we invite him to get $750,000 from us and for what? This is a strange situation," Prince Talal ibn Abdul Aziz said in an interview with Al-Jazeera television station. "What use does Clinton have now?" he added. But it's not clear whether the Saudi royal realized that Mrs. Clinton, who had just been elected to the Senate, was planning her own run for president of the United States before the decade is out. Throughout their years in the White House, the Clintons filed joint income tax returns, which, if still the case, would mean the bin Laden-Saudi cash was co-mingled with Mrs. Clinton's other income, such as the $8 million book advance she collected to write her memoirs. The former first couple has refused to release their tax returns since leaving the White House. A call to Sen. Clinton's office inquiring about the bin Laden-tainted payment was not immediately returned. Last week, Sen. Clinton accepted a coveted spot on the Senate Armed Services Committee, where she'll play a key role in congressional decisions affecting the U.S.'s war on terrorism. Another speaker at the Jeddah forum was first brother Neil Bush, but coverage of the event makes no mention of his being paid. While the Saudi royal family had reportedly donated $1 million to former President Bush's presidential library in College Station, Texas, in the early 1990s, there is no report of any Saudi payment to a Bush family member in the period since the 9/11 attacks. In March 2002, columnist Robert Novak, citing "high-ranking" Saudi sources, reported that, in addition to the $750,000 in speaking fees he collected last January, Mr. Clinton obtained a pledge from the Saudi royal family to bankroll his own presidential library with donations estimated to range from "less than $1 million to $20 million." Former White House adviser Dick Morris has predicted that monies collected by the Clinton library will be used to help fund Mrs. Clinton's presidential campaign.

Ken Mehlman is a horrible debator
Mood:  accident prone
Today Ken Mehlman, President Bush's National Campaign Manager, debated Bob Shrum, Kerry's Senior Campaign strategist. On at least 3 different times, Shrum alleged that the Military had Osama Bin Laden cornered in the Tora Bora Mountains. At least 3 times, Ken did not respond to the allegation. Now I remember General Tommy Franks saying that there is now intelligence that Osama was cornered in Tora Bora or anywhere else, but Mehlman doesn't shut Shrum down with this fact. Theis bizaar neglect really concerns me as a Bush voter. The Bush Cheney team needs to nip that issue in the Bud because ithat mud slinging seems to be very effective.

Voter Fraud by Democrats - their tradition continues
Mood:  irritated
Columnist Michelle Malkin has recently written on voter fraud in Tennessee, Ohio, Michigan, West Virginia and Wisconsin. ALL BY LEFT WING LIBERALS!! Can anybody find Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton, and other liberals to opine on this fraud by their own? Michelle Malkin's column about voter fraud can be found on her site: http://michellemalkin.com/archives/000596.htm

Please Email all 200 CBS Affiliates
Mood:  irritated
Since CBS is insistant on continued coordination with the Democratic National Committee to use fraud to attack President Bush, then you should emial them with your disgust. Email all 200 CBS Affiliates at the following link: http://www.rathergate.com/emailaffiliates.php

The truth about Michael Moore's Propaganda film
Mood:  celebratory
It is finally here!!


http://www.fahrenhype911.com/

Kerry supported Preemptive action against Iraq
Mood:  party time!
The Washington Times is now reporting what many blogs have posted for at least the last year...Kerry supported Preemptive action against Iraq! The folloing is the most popular post: During a 1997 debate on CNN's "Crossfire," Democratic presidential front-runner John Kerry made the case for launching a pre-emptive attack against Iraq, according to Rep. Peter King, R-N.Y., who appeared with Kerry on the program. According to King, Kerry argued: "We know we can't count on the French. We know we can't count on the Russians. We know that Iraq is a danger to the United States and we reserve the right to take pre-emptive action whenever we feel it's in our national interest." We need to find that video to do a commercial!!

The Republican Hush
Mood:  a-ok
Today is the 40th Anniversary of the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. There was not an hour's worth of celebration the highlighted the Republican leadership and the Democrat rejection of the Act. Republican U.S. Senator, Everett McKinley Dirksen is nothing more than a footnote in history, despite the fact that he is the single most important elected official involved in its passage. The RNC is simply a quiet ceremonial participant. Go Figure

Wal-Mart Suffrage
Mood:  happy
The largest and most sucessful retail company in the world is currently facing the largest discrimination lawsuit in History. In the tradidional of his liberal cohorts, U.S. District Judge Martin Jenkins certified a class action lawsuit for the 1.6 million woman legal movement to begin against Wal-Mart Department Stores. Left-Wing Liberals have been harpooning for this company for many years. They hate the success of this company and despise its ability to keep its consumners happy with fabulously lower prices. Liberals have wanted to organize Wal-Mart employees into unions and have fought rather successfully to keep them from opening stores anywhere. Trial lawyers are now desiring to extract cash by way of court order since Left-Wing Liberals couldn't get it via union contract negotiations. in a company the size of Wal-Mart, it may be easy to "find" instances where a man was paid more than a woman even though they do the same job. What I would like to know is what are the patterns of employee short-commings...or is the only possible perpetruater the corporation and the only possible victim is the employee? John Bisio, director of community relations in the Midwest for Wal-Mart is one of a few executives fanned across the United States to maintain a favorable image of Wal-Mart. While they are aggressive in keeping their prices low and having a relatively low theft rate, they are horrible at that image thing. This is the main reason that they are in this situation. As an example, name a Left-Wing Liberal corporation that has been dogged in the same manner as walmart. Disney/ABC is one company that is replete with racism, sexism, ageism. Have you ever seen Snow White Black? Has Cinderella ever been a man? Will Micky ever look old? This suffrage shakedown movement will only embolden the participants unless some response is asserted by Republicans...I won't hold my breath. I recommend that conservative attorneys respond to this bottom trawling by Left-Wing Liberals and use the same legal principles to force the opposition to live by the same laws that they sue others over.

Cowardice in the Black Church
The largest County in the United States of American just lost a game of Chicken against the ACLU. In a decision of 3-2, a threatened lawsuit of the ACLU successfully dictated to the County of Los Angeles to remove a tiny cross from its Symbol. This cross, recognizing part of the History of the City of the Angeles, is more than 47 years old. Yet a Black so-called African Methodist Episcopal (Yvonne B. Burke), and a Mexican so-called Catholic (Gloria Molina), capitulated to the ACLU that a tiny image of the cross made people "feel" unwelcomed to the County. They were joined by an Anti-Christian Scandinavian named Zev Yaroslavsky. Zev is Jewish. Descenters were Christians Don Knabe and Michael Antonovich. This issue is handled within a month's time without a peep from any Bishop Charles Blake of West Angeles Church of God in Christ, Dr. Cecil L. "Chip" Murray of First AME Church of Los Angeles, Dr. Frederick KC Price, DD Pastor and Founder of Crenshaw Christian Center are among the largest Black Churches in Los Angeles County. These churches all have super stars in sports, movies, and television among their memberships. All of these Pastors live in Supervisor Yvonne B. Burke's District as well as pastor these super large churches in her district. Not one of these churches, or their membership organized to defeat the barbarism of the ACLU. Blacks are indoctrinated to distrust and dislike Republicans while their leadership; The Left-Wing Liberals with their Democratic Party is actively involved in a cabal to prohibit any sign of Christianity, anywhere. I believe that the ACLU will soon target any organization that receives public dollars. Next, they will "Mob" threaten any organization that receives a government charter (i.e. 501(c)(3) status). Finally, they will "unleash their [legal] hounds" on any display of Christianity that can be seen from a public area or thoroughfare will be ordered removed. Eventually you will be able to walk into a Christian Church and not even realize that it is a Christian church.

So What, They are Liberal!
We have all by now, read the statistics by the PEW reasearch center. The overwhelming majority of Journalists descride themselves as liberal and/or moderate. In fact, only about 7% describe themselves as conservative. None of those who were liberal/moderate could point to a liberal news outlet but all of them said that Fox News Channel is concervative. I only wonder why it is that those of us conservatives who dislike the bias in the media still consumne their propaganda. As I have said in the past: I don't consumne Left-Wing Liberal news. I do not consumne most of Left-Wing Liberal entertainment. I do still listen to some music and because I have children, still goto Disneyland. The best way to get Left-Wing Liberals as Martin Sheen and Madonna to shut-up is to avoid consuming their tv shows and music. This is not a boycott, just don't consemne them at all. Also challenge them every time they disgrace our eyes and ears with their crow-sounding Bush-hating statements.

The liberal creap to Fox News
I notice lately that left-wing liberals are creaping onto the Fox News Channel. No matter the program, they are trickling to challlenge and be challenged on what they convey to information consumners. The latest in this episode is Carl Bernstein. He seemed to be amazed that he was confrinted by Sean Hannity on his double standard in his news reporting. For the first time in his career, he seemed to be suprised that there existed a person who would actually critique his work as biased. His arrogant posture gave away his disdain for Republicans in general and President Bush in particular. I am glad the Fox News Channel exists, If it did not then we would contunually be disinformed by Carl Bernstein and his cohorts in the propaganda-posed-as-journalism business.

Where is Kerry?
Short of diving off of a mountain cliff or crash landing into the White house, what can Senator Kerry to to get attention. I will contend that his press-ops, the Left-Wing Media, are sabatoging his campaign in an effort to harpoon President Bush's campaign. When was the last time that you saw a Kerry commercial? If you saw onewith in the last 3 days, then what was it? When was the last time you saw more than 5 minutes about Senator Kerry in a news cycle? WHERE. THE HELL, IS SENATOR KERRY? Unfortunately, Senator Kerry has to compete with current Bush policy being attacked by sadistic Left-Wing Media who are vouyeristically deludging the nation with male homosexual pornography in an Iraqi prison. He isn't even asked for his opinion on the matter. When he does speak, I notice the Left-Wing Media very careful not to give him too much time to make an ass of himself by the rediculous things he says on the campaign stump. As Rush Limbaugh said today on his show, eventually Senator kerry will have to participate ina debate. Eventually Senator Kerry will have to do live, open microphone, addresses that will not allow him to do a second take. What will he do? How will he act? The nervous ones of the Democratic Party will cringe in antitipation.

Its the Messenger, Stupid!!
I am listening to Liberal Republican Senator Lincoln Chaffe of Rhode Island on the Big Story on Fox News Channel. He is describing the earlier Capital Hill appearance of President Bush to the Repblican Caucus. Senator Chaffe is sbelly-aching overr why he couldn't ask President Bush certain questions about the war in Iraq. The problem is that Senator Chaffe is the only Republican who voted against the President and he is one of just a few Republicans who publically criticize the Presidents energy legislation. Senator Chaffe is the problem...He need to be replaced. When John Gibson, the host of the Big Story, questioned Senator Chaffee on why he doesn't adequately explain to his constituents the possibilities of higher gas prices, he just dodged the question and said that Rhode Islanders are just connecting higher gas prices to the War in Iraq. He seems to be too timid to lead his state. If Geoarge Bush loses this election, it will be because of attitudes such as Liberal Republican Senator Lincoln Chaffe.

Seperate positions, the same allegiance
Yesterday I watched black churchmen, civil rights leaders, and their laymen denounce the view that homosexual marriage is a civil rights issue. I laughed at those press conferences because despite the fact that they hold those views, they vote for the same people that homosexuals do. The arguments made Blacks during these press conferences will be ignored by their Left-Wing leadership because that leadership is making haste to be "En Vogue" with thier socialists friends across the pond. Ironically, The Bush Administration is doing "again" exactly what Blacks want...to eliminate this idea that this nation should recognize homosexual marriage. Unfortunately, this allegiance will not be seen as an honest closeness of ideas between Black and the Republican Party because of the perception Blacks have about the Republican Party. Even now, there is no person in the Republican leadership who is proclaiming this political agreement.

Focus on the Pump...For now
Ever since the Democrat Primaries, Left-Wing-Liberals have been trying to find ways to destroy President Bush. First they thought that the economy was going to be the silver bulllet, then they attempted to capitalize on President Bush's past military experience. Throughout those aformentioned attacks, they nashed their teeth on the idea that the War on Terror did not include Iraq and that the war in Iraq is an illegal, personal vendetta of President Bush. Thankfully, none of their fiery darts have penetrated. When CBS, one of the many Press Ops of World Wide Terrorism, got photos of an old investigation of Prisioner abuse in Iraq they thought that they finally would be able to bring down the Bush Administration. That story is now forced to share the News cycle with the unfortunate Murder of Nick Berg by those piece-loving muslims. In other words, Prisioner abuse in Iraq did not hurt President Bush. Now the focus is on the price of gas in America. What will be next if the Price of gas goes down?

Brown V. Board of Education
Brown V. Board of Education was not supported by the Democratic Party. It took a republican, Former California Earl Warren, to Lead the U.S. Supreme Court in deciding the case to end the formal segregation of Blacks by Democrats in the United States.

Slavery and Arabs
Historians agree that Arabs taught White westerners chattle slavery of human beings. In the United States, chattle slavery of Blacks was the wealth-building engine of Democrats. Maybe Democrats are just repaying Arabs for their assistance by defending them against Republicans.

Lynching and Beheading
Historically, Democratics protected those who lynched Blacks. Today, Democrats protect terrorists who shop heads off of Americans....hmmmmmm.

Conservatives Must Create Their Own News
Since my last post it seems that the only issue conservatives can discuss it the Bob Woodward book. It is true that Conservatives have uncovered lies, distortions, and revisions of truth but Conservatives are still discussing this tabloid as if their effort is somehow going to get liberals to see Woodward for the lying Left-Wing Liberalism he proclaims. Republicans must create their own news and stop merely responding to those who are creating news. For example, the Oil For Food Program (I discuss that in my artice, http://mdcurrington.tripod.com/mdc/Iraq_Blood_Iraq_Oil.html) must be the primary issue on the conscience of Conservatives. Left-Wing Liberals hate the very air that Republicans breathe. If Senator Kennedy's rants don't work they just goto President Bush's military records. If military records don't work they just call the Iraq War illegal. If the bad-mouthing the Iraq War doesn't work, they just begin mortar firing a series of books (Dick Clarke, Bob Woodward, etc.). Left-Wing Liberals do not care about their hypocritical reputation, they just want to destroy President Bush. Hopefully, the wake-up call in the republican leadership will accept that reality before it is too late to make a difference.

Bush Explains the Patriot Act...AGAIN!!
The Patriot Act was a Federal law past to combat terrorism in a more aggressive way as it does illegal drug dealing, mafias and mobs. During its movement through the Congress, the Bush Administration and its suppertors blanketed the Country with their advocacy to pass the Patriot Act. Ever since then, the Bush Administration and its supporters are on the defensive to reiterate its legitimacy. Now that parts of the Act are going to expire, they want to make the case AGAIN! The reason for this effort is simple. Left-wing Liberals do not recognize political cease fires, Republicans keep adhering to them. Republicans in all areas continute to lack political courage to combat the mortar rounds and roadside bombings perpetrated by Left-wing Liberals. So now, President Bush is restating the same thing that he stated before instead of building on top of it. Just think of all of the other issues gone to the side because of this "rebuilding" aproach to moving the President's agenda. Judicial nominees, energy issues, transporation issues, excessive taxation, and much more are "dying on the vine" due to the constant nursing that Republicans are giving to people who hate him. The only thing that can change this situation is that President Bush must force the agenda to the conserrvative den. For example, when journalists want to ask President Bush a question, he should only answer when he is in the company of his core constituency. That alone will force the the Liberal cabal in media to discuss more of the conservative agenda and keep control of the deebate. I only wish that President would listen to his core - for a change!